CompuBrain Social Media 2.0 Best Social Media Agency Website Designing Company Ahmedabad Web Designing Agency Surat Search Engine Optimization Baroda Social Media Marketing Digital Media Agency Rajkot Technology Consultancy Mumbai Internet Reputation Management in Gujarat Hosting Services India

Attention Graphic Designers and Social Media Managers! Republic Day is around and we are sure your clients' Republic Day Creative is already on your list. Here's a ready reckoner for the exact colours and size proportions that you should follow for the Indian National Flag. Lets make it uniform across the Internet and preserve the pride of our National Flag. #IndianNationalFlag #India #RepublicDay #26thJanuary #IndianRepublicDay #RepublicDay2017 #IndianFlagManual The standard sizes of the National Flag as per the Flag Code of India shall be as follows: Dimensions in mm 6300x4200 | 3600x2400 | 2700x1800 1800x1200 | 1350x900 | 900x600 450x300 | 225x150 | 150x100 You may hence choose your proportions appropriately. A sincere initiative by #CompuBrain More Details on www.compubrain.com/IndianFlagManual

Attention Graphic Designers and Social Media Managers! Republic Day is around and we are sure your clients' Republic Day Creative is already on your list. Here's a ready reckoner for the exact colours and size proportions that you should follow for the Indian National Flag. Lets make it uniform across the Internet and preserve the pride of our National Flag. #IndianNationalFlag #India #RepublicDay #26thJanuary #IndianRepublicDay #RepublicDay2017 #IndianFlagManual The standard sizes of the National Flag as per the Flag Code of India shall be as follows: Dimensions in mm 6300x4200 | 3600x2400 | 2700x1800 1800x1200 | 1350x900 | 900x600 450x300 | 225x150 | 150x100 You may hence choose your proportions appropriately. A sincere initiative by #CompuBrain More Details on www.compubrain.com/IndianFlagManual

Attention Graphic Designers and Social Media Managers! Republic Day is around and we are sure your clients' Republic Day Creative is already on your list. Here's a ready reckoner for the exact colours and size proportions that you should follow for the Indian National Flag. Lets make it uniform across the Internet and preserve the pride of our National Flag. #IndianNationalFlag #India #RepublicDay #26thJanuary #IndianRepublicDay #RepublicDay2017 #IndianFlagManual The standard sizes of the National Flag as per the Flag Code of India shall be as follows: Dimensions in mm 6300x4200 | 3600x2400 | 2700x1800 1800x1200 | 1350x900 | 900x600 450x300 | 225x150 | 150x100 You may hence choose your proportions appropriately. A sincere initiative by #CompuBrain More Details on www.compubrain.com/IndianFlagManual

Read More

Attention Graphic Designers and Social Media Managers! Republic Day is around and we are sure your clients' Republic Day Creative is already on your list. Here's a ready reckoner for the exact colours and size proportions that you should follow for the Indian National Flag. Lets make it uniform across the Internet and preserve the pride of our National Flag. #IndianNationalFlag #India #RepublicDay #26thJanuary #IndianRepublicDay #RepublicDay2017 #IndianFlagManual The standard sizes of the National Flag shall be as follows: Dimensions in mm 6300x4200 | 3600x2400 | 2700x1800 1800x1200 | 1350x900 | 900x600 450x300 | 225x150 | 150x100 You may hence choose your proportions appropriately. A sincere initiative by #CompuBrain More Details on www.compubrain.com/IndianFlagManual

Attention Graphic Designers and Social Media Managers! Republic Day is around and we are sure your clients' Republic Day Creative is already on your list. Here's a ready reckoner for the exact colours and size proportions that you should follow for the Indian National Flag. Lets make it uniform across the Internet and preserve the pride of our National Flag. #IndianNationalFlag #India #RepublicDay #26thJanuary #IndianRepublicDay #RepublicDay2017 #IndianFlagManual The standard sizes of the National Flag shall be as follows: Dimensions in mm 6300x4200 | 3600x2400 | 2700x1800 1800x1200 | 1350x900 | 900x600 450x300 | 225x150 | 150x100 You may hence choose your proportions appropriately. A sincere initiative by #CompuBrain More Details on www.compubrain.com/IndianFlagManual

Attention Graphic Designers and Social Media Managers! Republic Day is around and we are sure your clients' Republic Day Creative is already on your list. Here's a ready reckoner for the exact colours and size proportions that you should follow for the Indian National Flag. Lets make it uniform across the Internet and preserve the pride of our National Flag. #IndianNationalFlag #India #RepublicDay #26thJanuary #IndianRepublicDay #RepublicDay2017 #IndianFlagManual The standard sizes of the National Flag shall be as follows: Dimensions in mm 6300x4200 | 3600x2400 | 2700x1800 1800x1200 | 1350x900 | 900x600 450x300 | 225x150 | 150x100 You may hence choose your proportions appropriately. A sincere initiative by #CompuBrain More Details on www.compubrain.com/IndianFlagManual

Read More

#TechNews: Google's senior vice president of products Sundar Pichai, as saying that about 75% of its users now access their accounts on mobiles. #Google has reportedly announced that its email service has a total of 900 million active users, up from 425 million in 2012. #Business #Technology #Innovations #Gmail

#TechNews: Google's senior vice president of products Sundar Pichai, as saying that about 75% of its users now access their accounts on mobiles. #Google has reportedly announced that its email service has a total of 900 million active users, up from 425 million in 2012. #Business #Technology #Innovations #Gmail

#TechNews: Google's senior vice president of products Sundar Pichai, as saying that about 75% of its users now access their accounts on mobiles. #Google has reportedly announced that its email service has a total of 900 million active users, up from 425 million in 2012. #Business #Technology #Innovations #Gmail

Read More

:: Google: Sorry, Twitter, We Don’t Index the @ Symbol :: If you haven’t noticed that Google+ pages are increasingly becoming a part of Google search results, you may have noticed Google and Twitter’s increasingly public spat about it. Twitter argues that by promoting Google+ in search results, Google isn’t providing the most relevant social results. Meanwhile, Google has implied it would promote more pages from Twitter if it had adequate permission to do so. Twitter general council Alex Macgillivray then tweeted an example of why he thought Google’s new results were inefficient: Google search results for the search term “@WWE” — yes, with the “@” symbol — that did not include the organization’s Twitter page. Now Google has confirmed to Mashable that it has never indexed the “@” symbol. In other words, the search engine has never recognized a Twitter handle when it was formatted that way. So while a search for “WWE Twitter” still returns the organization’s Twitter feed before its Google+ page, “@WWE” returns the same results as “WWE” — in this case, with Google+ results first. Somehow a search for “+WWE” succeeds in returning a Google+ profile. But really, Google? The company with a car that drives itself? In more than five years of people searching for Twitter handles, you never got around to adding the @ symbol to your index? Even without the @ sign being indexed, however, the concern over the results for “@WWE” are valid: About 24,900 people have +1ed or added WWE to their circles on Google+ — but 792,642 people follow WWE on Twitter. In this case, and many others, the Twitter page is a more relevant social result than the Google+ page. Twitter ranks higher than Google+ for the WWE in Yahoo, AOL and Bing results. On the other hand, Twitter and Facebook haven’t necessarily made it easy for the search engine to feature them in results. Facebook denies Google’s crawlers access to its private pages, for one obvious reason — they’re private. Twitter includes “nofollow” links on its pages that make it hard for Google’s crawlers to index them. As Search Engine Land’s Danny Sullivan has pointed out, Google has indexed at least 3 billion pages. But Twitter users create 200 million Tweets every day that would be hard to index without access to the network’s firehose — access to which Google lost with expiration of an agreement last July. In the end, exactly how Google search results came to be dominated by Google+ pages — either as a result of having little access to other social networks or by intentionally ignoring them — isn’t that important. The important question is whether or not this domination is good for consumers. An issue which, if a complaint from privacy watchdog EPIC is effective, could be settled by the FTC. Source :- mashable.com

:: Google: Sorry, Twitter, We Don’t Index the @ Symbol :: If you haven’t noticed that Google+ pages are increasingly becoming a part of Google search results, you may have noticed Google and Twitter’s increasingly public spat about it. Twitter argues that by promoting Google+ in search results, Google isn’t providing the most relevant social results. Meanwhile, Google has implied it would promote more pages from Twitter if it had adequate permission to do so. Twitter general council Alex Macgillivray then tweeted an example of why he thought Google’s new results were inefficient: Google search results for the search term “@WWE” — yes, with the “@” symbol — that did not include the organization’s Twitter page. Now Google has confirmed to Mashable that it has never indexed the “@” symbol. In other words, the search engine has never recognized a Twitter handle when it was formatted that way. So while a search for “WWE Twitter” still returns the organization’s Twitter feed before its Google+ page, “@WWE” returns the same results as “WWE” — in this case, with Google+ results first. Somehow a search for “+WWE” succeeds in returning a Google+ profile. But really, Google? The company with a car that drives itself? In more than five years of people searching for Twitter handles, you never got around to adding the @ symbol to your index? Even without the @ sign being indexed, however, the concern over the results for “@WWE” are valid: About 24,900 people have +1ed or added WWE to their circles on Google+ — but 792,642 people follow WWE on Twitter. In this case, and many others, the Twitter page is a more relevant social result than the Google+ page. Twitter ranks higher than Google+ for the WWE in Yahoo, AOL and Bing results. On the other hand, Twitter and Facebook haven’t necessarily made it easy for the search engine to feature them in results. Facebook denies Google’s crawlers access to its private pages, for one obvious reason — they’re private. Twitter includes “nofollow” links on its pages that make it hard for Google’s crawlers to index them. As Search Engine Land’s Danny Sullivan has pointed out, Google has indexed at least 3 billion pages. But Twitter users create 200 million Tweets every day that would be hard to index without access to the network’s firehose — access to which Google lost with expiration of an agreement last July. In the end, exactly how Google search results came to be dominated by Google+ pages — either as a result of having little access to other social networks or by intentionally ignoring them — isn’t that important. The important question is whether or not this domination is good for consumers. An issue which, if a complaint from privacy watchdog EPIC is effective, could be settled by the FTC. Source :- mashable.com

:: Google: Sorry, Twitter, We Don’t Index the @ Symbol :: If you haven’t noticed that Google+ pages are increasingly becoming a part of Google search results, you may have noticed Google and Twitter’s increasingly public spat about it. Twitter argues that by promoting Google+ in search results, Google isn’t providing the most relevant social results. Meanwhile, Google has implied it would promote more pages from Twitter if it had adequate permission to do so. Twitter general council Alex Macgillivray then tweeted an example of why he thought Google’s new results were inefficient: Google search results for the search term “@WWE” — yes, with the “@” symbol — that did not include the organization’s Twitter page. Now Google has confirmed to Mashable that it has never indexed the “@” symbol. In other words, the search engine has never recognized a Twitter handle when it was formatted that way. So while a search for “WWE Twitter” still returns the organization’s Twitter feed before its Google+ page, “@WWE” returns the same results as “WWE” — in this case, with Google+ results first. Somehow a search for “+WWE” succeeds in returning a Google+ profile. But really, Google? The company with a car that drives itself? In more than five years of people searching for Twitter handles, you never got around to adding the @ symbol to your index? Even without the @ sign being indexed, however, the concern over the results for “@WWE” are valid: About 24,900 people have +1ed or added WWE to their circles on Google+ — but 792,642 people follow WWE on Twitter. In this case, and many others, the Twitter page is a more relevant social result than the Google+ page. Twitter ranks higher than Google+ for the WWE in Yahoo, AOL and Bing results. On the other hand, Twitter and Facebook haven’t necessarily made it easy for the search engine to feature them in results. Facebook denies Google’s crawlers access to its private pages, for one obvious reason — they’re private. Twitter includes “nofollow” links on its pages that make it hard for Google’s crawlers to index them. As Search Engine Land’s Danny Sullivan has pointed out, Google has indexed at least 3 billion pages. But Twitter users create 200 million Tweets every day that would be hard to index without access to the network’s firehose — access to which Google lost with expiration of an agreement last July. In the end, exactly how Google search results came to be dominated by Google+ pages — either as a result of having little access to other social networks or by intentionally ignoring them — isn’t that important. The important question is whether or not this domination is good for consumers. An issue which, if a complaint from privacy watchdog EPIC is effective, could be settled by the FTC. Source :- mashable.com

Read More

Facebook announced in November that its users would be able to share status updates up to 63,206 characters long. That’s a little harder to visualize than Twitter’s 140-character limit.If you’re curious how Facebook arrived at this seemingly random number, Facebook engineer Bob Baldwin explained to ZDnet, “I set the exact limit to something nerdy. Facebook … Face Boo K … hex(FACE) – K … 64206 – 1000 = 63206.” In other words, Baldwin calculated the number using the hexadecimal numeral system: The hexadecimal value of “FACE” is 64,206. Then, Baldwin subtracted “K,” or “kilo-” (the prefix for 1,000), to arrive at 63,206

Facebook announced in November that its users would be able to share status updates up to 63,206 characters long. That’s a little harder to visualize than Twitter’s 140-character limit.If you’re curious how Facebook arrived at this seemingly random number, Facebook engineer Bob Baldwin explained to ZDnet, “I set the exact limit to something nerdy. Facebook … Face Boo K … hex(FACE) – K … 64206 – 1000 = 63206.” In other words, Baldwin calculated the number using the hexadecimal numeral system: The hexadecimal value of “FACE” is 64,206. Then, Baldwin subtracted “K,” or “kilo-” (the prefix for 1,000), to arrive at 63,206

Facebook announced in November that its users would be able to share status updates up to 63,206 characters long. That’s a little harder to visualize than Twitter’s 140-character limit.If you’re curious how Facebook arrived at this seemingly random number, Facebook engineer Bob Baldwin explained to ZDnet, “I set the exact limit to something nerdy. Facebook … Face Boo K … hex(FACE) – K … 64206 – 1000 = 63206.” In other words, Baldwin calculated the number using the hexadecimal numeral system: The hexadecimal value of “FACE” is 64,206. Then, Baldwin subtracted “K,” or “kilo-” (the prefix for 1,000), to arrive at 63,206

Read More

"CompuBrain recommends you buy Linksys E4200" If you are planning to get your office/home environment Wireless with the updated technology and the best possible speed, CompuBrain recommends you buy Linksys E4200 (approx INR 9000), it comes with 3 bands of signal(1 band @ 5 ghz for all your latest laptops/netbooks/tablets/cell phones, 1 band @ 2.4 ghz for all devices made earlier than Dec' 10 and 1 band dedicated for your guest with a facility to restrict the bandwidth for your guest) The best part is that it comes with a USB port to plug your pendrive or an external harddrive to share it with all those devices coming in the network. All these with the highest level of security that you would desire to protect your wireless environment.

"CompuBrain recommends you buy Linksys E4200" If you are planning to get your office/home environment Wireless with the updated technology and the best possible speed, CompuBrain recommends you buy Linksys E4200 (approx INR 9000), it comes with 3 bands of signal(1 band @ 5 ghz for all your latest laptops/netbooks/tablets/cell phones, 1 band @ 2.4 ghz for all devices made earlier than Dec' 10 and 1 band dedicated for your guest with a facility to restrict the bandwidth for your guest) The best part is that it comes with a USB port to plug your pendrive or an external harddrive to share it with all those devices coming in the network. All these with the highest level of security that you would desire to protect your wireless environment.

"CompuBrain recommends you buy Linksys E4200" If you are planning to get your office/home environment Wireless with the updated technology and the best possible speed, CompuBrain recommends you buy Linksys E4200 (approx INR 9000), it comes with 3 bands of signal(1 band @ 5 ghz for all your latest laptops/netbooks/tablets/cell phones, 1 band @ 2.4 ghz for all devices made earlier than Dec' 10 and 1 band dedicated for your guest with a facility to restrict the bandwidth for your guest) The best part is that it comes with a USB port to plug your pendrive or an external harddrive to share it with all those devices coming in the network. All these with the highest level of security that you would desire to protect your wireless environment.

Read More